Value vs Growth Investing
Value and growth take turns leading, often for a decade. Why a broad index already owns both, and when tilting toward one makes sense.
Value vs Growth Investing
In 2022, US value stocks lost 7.5% while US growth stocks lost 29.1%. Over the five years that included that year, growth still won by a wide margin, because 2023 and 2024 handed growth returns of 42.7% and 32.2%. Anyone who switched camps in early 2023 on the evidence of 2022 got the worst of both.
That is the honest summary of this debate. The label tells you something real about a company's price relative to its profits. It tells you almost nothing reliable about the next ten years. For a median earner putting away a few hundred dollars a month, the value/growth question sits far below fees, concentration and your own behavior in the list of things that decide the outcome. Here is the arithmetic behind that ranking.
The two labels, briefly
Value stocks trade cheap against their fundamentals: low price-to-earnings, low price-to-book, often a decent dividend. The market has marked them down because of a problem, a slow industry, or boredom. Banks, energy, utilities, insurers and consumer staples live here.
Growth stocks trade at a premium because earnings are expected to compound quickly. High price-to-earnings, little or no dividend, profits reinvested. Technology, biotech, and whatever the current story is.
| What you are looking at | Value | Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-earnings | under about 15 | over about 25 |
| Price-to-book | under about 1.5 | over about 3.0 |
| Dividend yield | above about 2.5% | under about 1.0% |
| Revenue growth | under about 5% a year | above about 15% a year |
| Typical sectors | banks, energy, staples | technology, biotech |
None of those thresholds is a rule. They are the shape of the two categories, and the categories overlap constantly. A cheap stock that stops being cheap becomes a growth stock on the day the market re-rates it, without the business changing at all.
What the data actually supports
Since the 1920s, US value stocks have beaten growth by roughly 2 percentage points a year. Eugene Fama and Kenneth French documented that premium in the 1990s, and it is one of the most replicated findings in finance. It is also one of the most painful to own. Value trailed growth through most of the 2010s, badly enough that a lot of people concluded the premium was dead and moved their money. Then value beat growth in 2022 by more than 20 percentage points.
A premium of 2 points a year does not arrive as 2 points a year. It arrives in bursts, after long droughts, and the droughts are exactly when investors give up on it. If you cannot hold a position that is 30% behind the index for eight years, a value tilt is not available to you, however good the long-run evidence is.
- Value
- Growth
Growth won four years of five, and lost a quarter of its value in the year it lost.
Illustrative of the style split. Annual total returns for US large-cap value and growth indexes, 2020 to 2024.
Read that chart as a description of two different rides to a similar destination. The value line is flatter, the growth line is jagged. If a 29% drop in one year would make you sell, you already own a growth portfolio whether you chose one or not, and the honest move is to decide that in advance rather than in the middle of the drop.
The comparison that actually pays
Now the part that is certain rather than probable. Take a household earning $80,000, the rough US median, saving 15% of it: $1,000 a month for thirty years at a 7% gross return.
| Expenses | Net return | Balance after 30 years |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2% a year | 5.7% | about $1,203,000 |
| 1.5% a year | 5.5% | about $944,000 |
The gap is roughly $259,000, and that is the whole fee difference: no market call, no style judgement, no forecast. It is also about 21% of the final balance, given away for 1.3 percentage points that most people never check. The value premium, if you capture all of it, is worth roughly 2 points a year on the slice you tilt. Losing 1.3 points a year on everything you own is worth more than winning 2 points on a fifth of it. Fees beat factors as a place to spend your attention.
- 0.2% expenses
- 1.5% expenses
Two households, same income, same contributions, same market. The only difference is what the fund charges.
Illustrative. $1,000 monthly, 7% gross annual return, expenses deducted annually.
The rest of this guide is for members
Navigator members read all 82 guides, including this one, for €9.99/month. The calculators stay free either way.